Skip to content

Live

Best crypto exchange for large orders

At size, the fee stops mattering and depth takes over. A venue that wins on a $10,000 trade can be mid-pack — or unable to fill at all — on a $10,000,000 one, because your order walks deep into its order book. FeeFloor simulates a $10M BTC order against live depth on every venue; rows the book cannot fill within 2% of mid are marked depth-limited and excluded from the ranking rather than given a flattering estimate.

As of 3 August 2026, the cheapest crypto exchange for a $10M BTC futures trade is MEXC at $4.1K all-in.· measured 04:38 UTC

49 venues ranked for a $10M BTC futures buy order (taker), with referral discounts applied. Cheapest is MEXC at $4.1K.

Compare venues

Pick an asset, market and trade size — every venue ranked by measured cost, cheapest first.

Live data · updates in 60s

Market

Direction

Asset

USDC

Trade size (USD)

Custom size

Cheapest measured venue for this buy: MEXC at $4.1K on a $10M BTC futures order.

Pricing mode: FeeFloor signup discounts includedDiscounts apply to the fee only — spread and slippage are paid to the market. Our research reports rank on standard published fees.
49 venues ranked for a $10M BTC futures buy order (taker), with referral discounts applied. Cheapest is MEXC at $4.1K.
ExchangeAction
−10% · saves $200.00

Fee 1.80Spread 0.01Slip 2.29

$4.1K4.10 bpssaves $200.00Trade
−20% · saves $1.0K

Fee 4.00Spread 0.12Slip 1.24

$5.4K5.36 bpssaves $1.0KTrade
−10% · saves $600.00

Fee 5.40Spread 0.00Slip 0.00

$5.4K5.40 bpssaves $600.00Trade
−20% · saves $1.2K

Fee 4.80Spread 0.01Slip 1.11

$5.9K5.91 bpssaves $1.2KTrade
−25% · saves $1.5K

Fee 4.50Spread 0.01Slip 1.46

$6.0K5.97 bpssaves $1.5KTrade

Fee 6.00Spread 0.01Slip 0.83

$6.8K6.84 bpsTrade
OKXRecommended
−20% · saves $1.0K

Fee 4.00Spread 0.01Slip 3.14

$7.1K7.15 bpssaves $1.0KTrade
BybitRecommended
−20% · saves $1.1K

Fee 4.40Spread 0.01Slip 3.24

$7.6K7.64 bpssaves $1.1KTrade
−25% · saves $1.5K

Fee 4.50Spread 0.01Slip 3.17

$7.7K7.68 bpssaves $1.5KTrade
referral code

Fee 0.00Spread 0.23Slip 7.70

$7.9K7.93 bpsTrade
−10% · saves $500.00

Fee 4.50Spread 0.01Slip 3.86

$8.4K8.37 bpssaves $500.00Trade
KrakenRecommended
−20% · saves $1.0K

Fee 4.00Spread 0.64Slip 6.00

$10.6K10.63 bpssaves $1.0KTrade
−10% · saves $350.00

Fee 3.15Spread 0.01Slip 8.10

$11.3K11.25 bpssaves $350.00Trade

Fee 6.00Spread 0.02Slip 6.70

$12.7K12.71 bpsTrade

Fee 3.50Spread 0.00Slip 10.48

$14.0K13.98 bpsTrade

Fee

Trading fee charged by the venue, after your referral discount.

Spread

Half the difference between best bid and ask at measurement time.

Slippage

Price impact of walking the live order book at your trade size.

Total cost

Fee + spread + slippage — the true execution cost, in basis points. 1 bps = 0.01%.

BTC futures cost by venue

Related comparisons

Common questions

What does "depth-limited" mean on this page?

It means a venue's visible order book doesn't hold enough liquidity within our depth cutoff to fill the requested size without moving price further than we're willing to extrapolate. Rather than estimate past that point, we flag the row as depth-limited and exclude it from the ranking.

What is the 2%-of-mid depth cutoff, and why does it exist?

We only simulate a fill using order-book levels within 2% of the mid price. Beyond that, books usually thin out and conditions can shift fast enough that extending the walk further would produce a number that looks precise but isn't trustworthy — so we stop and mark the row instead of guessing.

Why does the cheapest venue for a small order stop being the cheapest at $10M?

Fees are a flat percentage regardless of size, but order-book depth is not evenly distributed — some venues post plenty of liquidity near the mid and little beyond it, while others carry deeper books further out. A large order walks past the thin part of the book, so slippage, not fee, usually decides the ranking at this size.

How is slippage actually calculated for a $10M order?

We take the live order-book levels and simulate filling the full $10M against them level by level, then compute the volume-weighted average price of that simulated fill against the mid price. The difference, in basis points, is the slippage figure — it reflects the book at the moment of measurement, not a historical average.

Should I expect to actually get this price on a real $10M order?

Treat it as an estimate of execution cost at the moment of measurement, not a guarantee. Books move between our sample and your order, some venues will requote or partially fill very large orders, and splitting an order across time or venues — which this page doesn't model — can change your real result.

The full measurement method — including what we deliberately do not measure — is on the methodology page.