Jupiter fees & measured trading cost

DEXReferral code applied

Jupiter does not use a conventional order book: it settles futures trades against an oracle price. FeeFloor therefore doesn’t calculate order-book spread or slippage for it and reports the protocol cost components its current model supports. FeeFloor measures Jupiter's futures market on BTC, ETH, SOL and XRP, live against every venue we track, and a $100K BTC futures order currently reports $70.00 in those components. Funding, borrowing, price-impact and withdrawal costs sit outside that figure and aren’t included here.

Markets measured: futures
Assets: BTC, ETH, SOL and XRP
Pricing: oracle-priced (no order book)

Live verdict · $100K BTC futures · taker

Measured 10:53 UTC · updates every minute

Rank

#40

of 49 venues

Measured cost

7.00 bps

fee + spread + slippage

On a $100K trade

$70.00

what you actually pay

Vs the floor

+$100.72

GMTrade sets it at -3.07 bps

No markup, no paid placement — the ranking above is pure measurement.

Trade on JupiterReferral code applied

Where the cost comes fromat $100K

Fee

6.00 bps

$60.00 on a $100K trade

The published taker fee — the only number most comparison sites show you.

Spread

0.00 bps

$0.00 on a $100K trade

Half the gap between best bid and ask. You pay it the instant your market order fills.

Slippage

1.00 bps

$10.00 on a $100K trade

Not calculated — this venue settles against an oracle, not an order book, so FeeFloor doesn’t compute book slippage here. Any price-impact term is part of the protocol model, not shown as slippage.

What our measurements show

Jupiter's rank moves with trade size: #34 of 49 at $1M, but #45 at $10K. Fees are flat — depth is not.

At $100K, Jupiter runs 34% above the median venue we track (7.00 bps vs 5.23 bps).

Pricing comes from an oracle rather than an order book, so FeeFloor reports the 6.00 bps protocol fee and doesn't compute book spread or slippage — the order-book components other venues carry don't apply here. Funding, borrowing and any price-impact terms are separate.

Cost by trade size

Fees are flat, but spread and slippage scale with size — so a venue that wins at $10K can be mid-pack at $10M. BTC futures, taker.

Size	Rank	Total cost	In dollars	Vs the floor
$10K	45	7.00 bps	$7.00	+$10.19 vs GMTrade
$100K	40	7.00 bps	$70.00	+$100.72 vs GMTrade
$1M	34	10.00 bps	$1.0K	+$1.1K vs GMTrade
$10M	45	46.00 bps	$46.0K	depth-limited

Cheaper right now$100K BTC futures

Reya6.92 bps−$0.84vs

WhiteBIT6.10 bps−$9.00vs

Ostium6.10 bps−$9.03vs

Jupiter: quick answers

What does a $100K BTC trade actually cost on Jupiter?

As of 3 August 2026, a $100K BTC futures market order on Jupiter costs $70.00 all-in (7.00 bps): 6.00 bps fee, 0.00 bps spread and 1.00 bps slippage. That ranks #40 of 49 venues we measure.

Is Jupiter better for small or large orders?

Right now, small orders: Jupiter ranks #45 at $10K and #45 at $10M. Fees are flat percentages, but slippage grows with size, so the answer shifts with the venue's live order-book depth.

Does Jupiter have hidden costs beyond the trading fee?

Jupiter does not use a conventional order book — it settles against an oracle price. FeeFloor therefore does not calculate order-book spread or slippage for it and reports the protocol cost components its current model exposes. Funding, borrowing, price-impact and withdrawal costs sit outside that figure.

Ready to trade on Jupiter?

New accounts get Referral code applied from the first trade — on top of $70.00 all-in execution.

Affiliate link · rankings can’t be bought